summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/development/openocd/0001-build-remove-warnings-with-gcc-11.patch
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'development/openocd/0001-build-remove-warnings-with-gcc-11.patch')
-rw-r--r--development/openocd/0001-build-remove-warnings-with-gcc-11.patch83
1 files changed, 83 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/development/openocd/0001-build-remove-warnings-with-gcc-11.patch b/development/openocd/0001-build-remove-warnings-with-gcc-11.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..3b384bf6e9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/development/openocd/0001-build-remove-warnings-with-gcc-11.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
+From 6db49eb8858023654084088c73d968e190aec491 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Rene Kita <git@rkta.de>
+Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 18:38:02 +0100
+Subject: [PATCH] build: remove warnings with gcc 11
+
+This removes some warnings which prevent a successful build with -Werror
+which is enabled by default. I'm using gcc 11, so maybe others are not
+getting this warnings yet.
+
+In src/flash/nor/numicro.c the debug messages were misleadingly indented.
+In src/target/arm920t.c the array size where smaller than expected from
+the receiving function.
+
+Change-Id: I66f5c6a63beb9f9416e73b726299297476c884d8
+Signed-off-by: Rene Kita <git@rkta.de>
+Reviewed-on: http://openocd.zylin.com/6104
+Reviewed-by: Jonathan McDowell <noodles-openocd@earth.li>
+Tested-by: jenkins
+Reviewed-by: Tomas Vanek <vanekt@fbl.cz>
+Reviewed-by: Antonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com>
+---
+ src/flash/nor/numicro.c | 6 +++---
+ src/target/arm920t.c | 6 +++---
+ 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
+
+diff --git a/src/flash/nor/numicro.c b/src/flash/nor/numicro.c
+index 7609fa81c..1971daa24 100644
+--- a/src/flash/nor/numicro.c
++++ b/src/flash/nor/numicro.c
+@@ -1243,7 +1243,7 @@ static uint32_t numicro_fmc_cmd(struct target *target, uint32_t cmd, uint32_t ad
+ retval = target_read_u32(target, NUMICRO_FLASH_ISPTRG, &status);
+ if (retval != ERROR_OK)
+ return retval;
+- LOG_DEBUG("status: 0x%" PRIx32 "", status);
++ LOG_DEBUG("status: 0x%" PRIx32 "", status);
+ if ((status & (ISPTRG_ISPGO)) == 0)
+ break;
+ if (timeout-- <= 0) {
+@@ -1512,7 +1512,7 @@ static int numicro_erase(struct flash_bank *bank, unsigned int first,
+ retval = target_read_u32(target, NUMICRO_FLASH_ISPTRG, &status);
+ if (retval != ERROR_OK)
+ return retval;
+- LOG_DEBUG("status: 0x%" PRIx32 "", status);
++ LOG_DEBUG("status: 0x%" PRIx32 "", status);
+ if (status == 0)
+ break;
+ if (timeout-- <= 0) {
+@@ -1601,7 +1601,7 @@ static int numicro_write(struct flash_bank *bank, const uint8_t *buffer,
+ retval = target_read_u32(target, NUMICRO_FLASH_ISPTRG, &status);
+ if (retval != ERROR_OK)
+ return retval;
+- LOG_DEBUG("status: 0x%" PRIx32 "", status);
++ LOG_DEBUG("status: 0x%" PRIx32 "", status);
+ if (status == 0)
+ break;
+ if (timeout-- <= 0) {
+diff --git a/src/target/arm920t.c b/src/target/arm920t.c
+index 80f6d7045..a45dc6420 100644
+--- a/src/target/arm920t.c
++++ b/src/target/arm920t.c
+@@ -245,8 +245,8 @@ static int arm920t_read_cp15_interpreted(struct target *target,
+ uint32_t cp15_opcode, uint32_t address, uint32_t *value)
+ {
+ struct arm *arm = target_to_arm(target);
+- uint32_t *regs_p[1];
+- uint32_t regs[2];
++ uint32_t *regs_p[16];
++ uint32_t regs[16];
+ uint32_t cp15c15 = 0x0;
+ struct reg *r = arm->core_cache->reg_list;
+
+@@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ int arm920t_write_cp15_interpreted(struct target *target,
+ {
+ uint32_t cp15c15 = 0x0;
+ struct arm *arm = target_to_arm(target);
+- uint32_t regs[2];
++ uint32_t regs[16];
+ struct reg *r = arm->core_cache->reg_list;
+
+ /* load value, address into R0, R1 */
+--
+2.35.1
+