1 files changed, 0 insertions, 56 deletions
diff --git a/system/xen/patches/xsa155-xen-0001-xen-Add-RING_COPY_REQUEST.patch b/system/xen/patches/xsa155-xen-0001-xen-Add-RING_COPY_REQUEST.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index 7935e58c40..0000000000
--- a/system/xen/patches/xsa155-xen-0001-xen-Add-RING_COPY_REQUEST.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,56 +0,0 @@
-From 12b11658a9d6a654a1e7acbf2f2d56ce9a396c86 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
-Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 11:59:05 -0500
-Subject: [PATCH 1/3] xen: Add RING_COPY_REQUEST()
-
-Using RING_GET_REQUEST() on a shared ring is easy to use incorrectly
-(i.e., by not considering that the other end may alter the data in the
-shared ring while it is being inspected).  Safe usage of a request
-generally requires taking a local copy.
-
-Provide a RING_COPY_REQUEST() macro to use instead of
-RING_GET_REQUEST() and an open-coded memcpy().  This takes care of
-ensuring that the copy is done correctly regardless of any possible
-compiler optimizations.
-
-Use a volatile source to prevent the compiler from reordering or
-omitting the copy.
-
-This is part of XSA155.
-
-Signed-off-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
-Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
----
-v2: Add comment about GCC bug.
----
- xen/include/public/io/ring.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
-
-diff --git a/xen/include/public/io/ring.h b/xen/include/public/io/ring.h
-index ba9401b..801c0da 100644
---- a/xen/include/public/io/ring.h
-+++ b/xen/include/public/io/ring.h
-@@ -212,6 +212,20 @@ typedef struct __name##_back_ring __name##_back_ring_t
- #define RING_GET_REQUEST(_r, _idx)                                      \
-     (&((_r)->sring->ring[((_idx) & (RING_SIZE(_r) - 1))].req))
- 
-+/*
-+ * Get a local copy of a request.
-+ *
-+ * Use this in preference to RING_GET_REQUEST() so all processing is
-+ * done on a local copy that cannot be modified by the other end.
-+ *
-+ * Note that https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58145 may cause this
-+ * to be ineffective where _req is a struct which consists of only bitfields.
-+ */
-+#define RING_COPY_REQUEST(_r, _idx, _req) do {				\
-+	/* Use volatile to force the copy into _req. */			\
-+	*(_req) = *(volatile typeof(_req))RING_GET_REQUEST(_r, _idx);	\
-+} while (0)
-+
- #define RING_GET_RESPONSE(_r, _idx)                                     \
-     (&((_r)->sring->ring[((_idx) & (RING_SIZE(_r) - 1))].rsp))
- 
--- 
-2.1.0
-